Was it a Good Idea? Dialectics again

In a similar vein to my recent post Difficult ≠ Disaster, I have been practising challenging my tendency to black and white thinking. 

Last weekend I took part in a dance performance, the first I have done in nearly four years. It involved lots of weekend rehearsals, time away from Lil' Peggy and Mr Peggy and one extremely long and stressful day for all of us! I deliberated for a long time before committing in August because I couldn't decide whether it would be a Good Idea or a Bad Idea to participate.

It's a particularly autistic thinking style although obviously only too familiar to most non-autistic people as well. We just seem to lean especially towards categorising things into two extremes: Good or bad, possible or impossible, nice or horrible, right or wrong.

For me, it makes the world easier to navigate: if I know what is what then I know what to expect, how to respond correctly to things, and it's clear what is safe, good and acceptable and what needs to be avoided. Grey areas are confusing and require a lot of processing, for which I don't always have capacity (or which takes away from my capacity for other things).

So it's a logical, sensible thing for my brain to do, to economise on power by simplifying things and ultimately to keep me "safe" by making sure I don't run into trouble of any kind (anything from physical accidents to social rejection).

The problem is, there are a couple of side effects.

• Things don't just fit into those categories. Most things in the world are a mixture of positive and negative, and there are situations where rules change and need to be flexible. Things can fit in more than one category or switch categories depending on context. 
• It can result in the "safe" option shrinking and shrinking to make sure I'm really certain it's safe.
• You can miss out on or eliminate things that would bring some benefit because they also have negative aspects.
• You can appear judgmental or critical (or overly liberal!) if you draw your lines in the wrong places. Which in itself is an example of what I'm talking about! There usually isn't a "right" or "wrong" place to draw the line - different people draw their metaphorical lines in different places!

So how to avoid these pitfalls if you are a naturally black-and-white thinker? Firstly just realising that you see and interpret the world through that lens can help. Once you realise and notice yourself doing it (as I did above!) you can start to enquire as to whether that's the only way it can be seen or whether there might be more options.

For myself, I think I've found three alternatives to a black and white view:

1. Perhaps most obviously but perhaps most difficult for a habitually and naturally binary thinker, is to see a continuum. Although there is an extreme at each end, states exist in between. To be honest, I think as well as being hard to do this one may not be the most helpful because even a continuum suggests the relationship between the two extremes is a linear scale - more to less, good to bad - which it may not always be (it may vary dependent on context, for example).

2. Get dialectical about it: both of these things can be true! I have waxed lyrical about this phrase before so I'll keep it brief, but if you can get your binary head around entertaining the coexistence of opposing states it will truly change your internal landscape (in a good way).

3. If that's a step too far, sometimes a manageable first step for me in shifting my thinking or perception is just to subtly relabel my categories. Instead of possible and impossible, I might choose likely and unlikely or easy and difficult. Bad and good might become upsetting and enjoyable. The lines soften, possibilities other than the extremes begin to exist.

I did the project and of course, it wasn't a Good Idea or a Bad Idea. I kept having moments where I thought I'd definitely done the Wrong Thing by doing it, or the Right Thing. When really, I had just done A Thing. There were positives and negatives. Moments where I remembered and relished in my love of dance and was so glad I hadn't let myself move further and further from that world, and moments where I wished so hard that I didn't have to put my small person through so much upset and spend so many of my resources and down time being sociable at the weekend when I am usually recharging. Swings and roundabouts. It doesn't have to be one or the other.

I'm glad I did it, and I'm glad it's over.

Both of these things can be true (dialectics)

 Sooo, here is a thing that has popped up in an awful lot of conversations this week. Different people, different scenarios, and not just me going on about it special-interest-style - it's emerged spontaneously in conversation, brought up by either person. Although true to character it is often me that gets excited and starts yelling about it when I notice we've ended up there again. I do love making links and identifying things: it helps the world connect together and make sense.

I will always remember a particular nurse who was oft heard to remind patients "both of these things can be true." I think of her every time I exclaim it mid-conversation, and I will never forget the mind-blowing effect it had on me the first time I heard it. It's a devastatingly simple concept, but was a whole new world to me, two things being true at once, the world not being binary black and white boxes. Transformational!

When I am anxious about an upcoming event I get asked, "will you even enjoy it at all"? or "is it worth putting yourself through this?" and I find myself trying to explain the conundrum of how it's OK to go because although I am and will be anxious, I will have fun too. Then I realise it's really simple: it's that thing again! Both of these things can be true. Although anxiety may at a first glance appear to preclude positive emotions, in truth I can have anxiety and have enjoyment at the same time. I have anxiety most of the time so it's pretty lucky that's true or my life would be incredibly dark and dismal. Two statements that seem completely at odds with one another may actually both be true.

The principle works for a whole host of scenarios. 

A teenager may want independence and want the support and care of their parents

A parent may love their child and impose consequences for their behaviour

You may have an argument with someone and still be friends with them

You may be terrified of something and you may want (or need) to do it anyway

In some cases we may only even see one of the truths - certainly only give one any weight. Because I have a one-track mind, I forget that more than one thing can happen at once. I note the uppermost thought or emotion occurring in a time of distress and take that to be the truth. 

Because our brains are programmed to keep us safe they are particularly alert to danger and keen to warn us of potential threats (remember if our brain perceives a threat as real it acts as though it is, whether that makes logical sense or not), so we are likely to form speedy assessments in situations where there is any possibility of "danger" (including danger of being rejected or overwhelmed). This can give us a tendency to think in a very black and white way (particularly characteristic of autistic people anyway), to jump to conclusions and mind read what we assume others "must" be thinking. And it means that the uppermost thought or emotion tends to be the most threatening one.

If I have a disagreement with somebody, in my head I think they think I am wrong, which in the immediate instance, they probably do. The trouble is, this becomes my truth. I think that that then defines their opinion of me as a person. I forget the quite possibly simultaneously-occurring truth that they like me and/or respect my opinions.

I make a mistake and I forget that alongside "I got it wrong" can exist the truths "I meant well," "I tried my hardest," "I am loved regardless."

So I'm glad this has come up repeatedly in my conversations because it's so easy to forget, but it's one of the many wonders of DBT!

Scenarios paraphrased from: https://www.mindsoother.com/blog/how-to-think-and-act-dialectically

Further brief introduction at https://www.sheppardpratt.org/news-views/story/dbt-101-what-does-dialectical-even-mean/