Saturday, 3 December 2016

What is reasonable?

One of the worst things about being autistic is that I have found I often have no idea what is OK, normal or reasonable.

I always used to think I was pretty objective and mostly knew what was normal, reasonable or accepted. I never really questioned my responses to things, but I think this was because growing up at home my family and few friends were pretty easygoing and pretty similar to me. We never felt the need to dictate to each other how to do things or what opinions to have. We were often approaching things from the same direction and our opinions were often similar, and when they weren't, it was fine to differ and that didn't threaten or offend anybody.

Image result for am I reasonable?


In the last couple of years my experience of different people from different backgrounds has widened, and the proximity I am in with some of them is a lot closer, and it led me initially to questioning, and then to a lot of confusion.

I will ignore questions of fact here, as fact-based disagreements are more a matter of negotiating by tact and I covered this a little in my previous post on memory.

It's opinions, expectations and ways of doing things that are more of a problem, when there is no "right answer" or each party is equally convinced of the correctness of their perspective.

Image result for threatened by different opinionsI know that my opinion or way of doing things isn't necessarily the only valid one, and a different way may seem as good to someone else as my way seems to me ("every man is right in his own eyes"), but I also know that I am entitled to an opinion.

I find it really difficult to balance these two points. How often should one give way to another? For many years it didn't occur to me to form my own opinions, and when I did I rarely expressed them, assuming that they were erroneously formed or otherwise invalid. When I eventually developed a sense of myself I realised I was sometimes right when I differed from others and I became able to stand on my own two feet, but I lost some of the gentleness I had before I realised it was OK to be me.

I can't sustain denying or hiding my (autistic or personal - if indeed it is possible to distinguish) opinions the way I used to, but I can't bear the thought of trampling on other people to be me.
So I suppose I am now wondering just how much it's OK to be me. Are my expectations, desires and opinions reasonable or not? Are they any more or less valid because of autism? (eg. I really hate that particular smell, and it's not just a matter of opinion, but how do you explain that to someone else, and if they love that smell, it's surely not fair that I can just say no, denying them something that brings them pleasure.)

Image result for compromise
I think it works something like this, but how
do you know what is a want and what is a need?
It's all about compromise and negotiation, and everybody having a bit of give and take. The trouble is, I have no idea how much of each and where and when, is reasonable! And there is no objective way to work out how much something matters to someone else either. If something bothers me a little but I know it's a big deal for someone else, it's easy for me to compromise to accommodate them, but when it bothers me a lot, it's hard to know if it bothers them a lot too, and whether I'm being reasonable or not.

When the problem continues despite repeated attempts to explain, then I assume my reaction must be unreasonable and I must learn to deal with the issue, no matter what it costs me. Can anyone tell me whether this assumption is correct?

I think it also depends on who the other person/people is/are. A matter is often easier to resolve with work colleagues because you are less emotionally involved and afraid of offending them, and I think it's understood that people will differ and just get on with things in their own way, which is harder when it's things in your own house with your own family.

I was also going to write here about What is Reasonable in conversation and social interaction, but I think I will split it into two posts as it's becoming a bit lengthy!

So I think there are no magic answers to working out what is reasonable, and that each case is different depending on the situation. That is what makes it such a tricky subject, because there's no objective "fairness" formula and no quick answer. I just hope that as I get older and more experienced, these conundrums will become clearer to deal with and I will get better at accepting other ways of doing things.

Please comment if you have anything to say on this matter - it's a really tricky one for me!

No comments:

Post a Comment